BEPW1300 vs 1700 vs 2000-GB: choose the working route

Compare three GB packages, not three worldwide names

This comparison covers BEPW1300-GB, BEPW1700-GB and BEPW2000-GB with the European Type 1 manual. It excludes BEPW1300L, US packages and UAE B5 variants. Those suffixes can change accessories or electrical identity; do not copy a marketplace photograph into the comparison just because the large model number matches.

The compact 1300 has a 3 m pressure hose. The wheeled 1700 extends that to 5 m; the 2000 has 6 m and adds a supplied turbo nozzle. All three verified GB packages include an adjustable fan/pencil nozzle and a 0.5 L soap bottle. None of these facts proves that a particular cleaning job will finish in a promised time.

Read the matched figures

Swipe or scroll horizontally to see all columns.

Keep rated and maximum columns distinct. Maximum flow is not automatically the minimum tap-supply requirement, and multiplying two maxima does not create an independently measured cleaning score. Compare the actual attachment and hose arrangement before deciding that the largest number is necessary.

Small jobs near a fixed supply

For robust nonpowered garden tools whose maker explicitly permits pressure washing next to the tap, trace a 3 m gun route. If it covers the job and you can place the compact body securely, BEPW1300 may avoid paying for reach you will not use. The absence of a supplied turbo nozzle is not necessarily a drawback for work needing careful spray control.

Do not hold a tool under the jet in your hand. Secure the object first. If its maker prohibits pressure washing or its surface tolerance is unclear, use an approved hand-cleaning method instead. The compact machine’s lower headline pressure does not make a concentrated pencil jet harmless.

Furniture spread across a patio

If 3 m forces repeated moves but 5 m covers the real route, BEPW1700 offers a concrete handling improvement. Its wheels and telescopic handle help transport; they do not permit dragging a running washer. Map a safe stopping and repositioning point instead of letting the hose pull the machine.

The 2000 adds only 1 m beyond the 1700’s hose. Before paying for that increment, measure whether it actually reaches the missing area after bends and obstacles. If neither route works safely, a different factory configuration or a verified compatible arrangement may be more useful than choosing the largest member of this family automatically.

A robust-surface task needing the turbo option

BEPW2000 is the package to examine when the included turbo nozzle is genuinely appropriate and would otherwise be an extra purchase. Count the complete kit cost, not just the machine. Test the actual surface: a strong slab beside a weak joint is not an all-clear for aggressive cleaning.

If the task is mainly applying detergent, the 2000 does not uniquely solve it. The gun-mounted soap bottle is shared. A bottle that replaces the wand must be fitted correctly; poor detergent delivery is not evidence that the smaller motor lacks power. All three also advertise optional self-priming equipment, not a universal permission to draw dirty water through an ordinary hose.

Choose neither until basic conditions are sound

Cold clean water, suitable backflow protection, appropriate electrical supply and a safe working position are required whichever size you buy. Neither a 150 bar label nor an extra meter fixes those conditions. If you cannot establish surface tolerance or manage runoff, select a different cleaning method first.

A useful conclusion is specific: 1300 for a verified short route, 1700 for a meaningful 5 m layout, or 2000 for a usable 6 m route plus a suitable included turbo attachment. Then check the exact GB carton, local service and total accessories before ordering.